Kansas Governor Vetoes Workers Compensation Bill

James B. Biggs
James B. Biggs
Contributor
Posted by James B. BiggsMarch 24, 2006 10:35 AM
Tags: None

Legislation that would change the amount of benefits due to injured workers has been vetoed by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. Over the past month benefits for injured workers has become a hot topic in Kansas with businesses and trial lawyer associations fighting on both sides of the battle. This specific measure would have limited an employers' responsibility for workers' compensation when an employee's injury is connected to a pre-existing condition.

In supporting the veto, Sebelius noted that workers' compensation rates in Kansas are among the lowest in the nation and benefits paid to injured workers in Kansas also rank near the bottom. The Governor also had issue as to whether the bill would adversely effect military personnel who attempt to enter the workforce after being injured while serving their country.

Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, who led the bill through the Senate, has spoken out against the veto. Brownlee feels that workers' compensation premiums aren't lower for all employers and that the purpose of the bill was to ensure that businesses are paying for old injuries of their workers.

As of now, it does not appear that enough votes would be available to override Sebelius' decision. The bill passed the Senate with two-thirds support, but was 17 votes shy in the House.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Connie Carmn
Posted by Connie Carmn
July 09, 2007 12:33 PM

The Kansas Workers Compensation system is a joke. Benefits received and medical care needed worked fairly well for my husband who was injured 2 years ago. However, the settlement issues are disgusting and the reflection on Kansas and how they take care of their workers is pathetic. The so-called pre-existing (arthritis?????GIVE ME A BREAK)

My husband was 65 years old and could have driven and delivered chemicals for several years yet. We now, however, have lost his total income for the rest of our lives, he was put on a 35# lifting restriction. He was given a paltry 9% impairment rating. After all, he had arthritis! This had never kept him from doing his job. We didn't even know he had arthritis as it never bothered him. He now suffers from constant pain and delivers newspapers to generate a little income.(However, I am sure the physician was extremely well paid). To add insult to injury he had started drawing his social security(as a seasonal employee he never had a retirement account nor did he make enough income to invest in one)so now his puny $15,000 settlement can be taken away from us by the Social Security Administration. He was released in December of 2005 and we are still waiting for his settlement&July-2007) As far as I am concerned, the Work Comp Insurance company should be paying us interest on OUR money. Also, Kansas, you should be thoroughly ashamed of the way you treat Kansas workers.

Also, any of you policitians who go along with this should be strung up like the "horse thieves" you are. Just sign me as thoroughly disgusted with the injustice applied to the VICTIMS of the Kansas workers compensation system.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Topeka

InjuryBoard Topeka RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address